Conservative Literacy Cuts
Author: anne | Date: January 31, 2007 | Please Comment!
Mike flipped through the manual and tossed it aside. He was alone on the shop floor, but thought “How much different can this one be from the old model?”
Switching it on, he heard a quiet hum and started feeding in pieces of sheet metal. Suddenly, the machine jammed. Reaching inside as he had done a thousand times before on the old, familiar machine, he heard a horrible screech and then a crunch. Just before he passed out, he realized his left arm had been severed at the elbow.
But Mike was lucky. According to a recent report from the Centre for the Study of Living Standards, 143 Albertans were killed on the job in 2005 — nearly double the number from a decade ago. Thousands more suffered serious injuries, and countless accidents went unreported.
The reason Mike tossed the safety manual aside was that he couldn’t read it. He represents one of the 753,000 Albertans (40 per cent of the province’s population) who are functionally illiterate — that is, they lack the ability to identify, understand, interpret, and communicate complex ideas and concepts through written and numeric materials.
Sure, Mike could read basic words, but he didn’t have the literacy skills necessary to comprehend the instruction manual for a sophisticated piece of machinery.
Literacy Alberta (along with its provincial counterparts elsewhere) promotes the importance of literacy as a serious health, safety, and economic issue.
Unfortunately, literacy groups across the country have seen their funding from Ottawa shrivel up as the federal government tries to rein in discretionary spending.
Aside from the health and safety issue at stake — which must be considered the most compelling reason why we need to ensure our workers are functionally literate — there are two significant reasons why inadequate levels of literacy are a growing concern in Alberta.
The first relates to labour shortages. The province is desperately short of workers, yet no one seemed to notice that 143 were killed in job-related accidents, some of them due to illiteracy. If they had possessed the reading comprehension skills to understand the safety manuals, some of those 143 workers may be alive today. The province is looking to bring in thousands of overseas workers to help fill the gaps. Immigrant workers are certainly a part of the solution for Alberta, but shouldn’t keeping the existing workers alive and healthy be a solution, too?
Literacy Alberta (along with its provincial counterparts elsewhere) promotes the importance of literacy as a serious health, safety, and economic issue.
The second reason has to do with productivity. Canadian workers have been thrashed in the media by economists who worry about our country’s flagging productivity. Most of us resent being told we are unproductive — the implication is that we are lazy.
Productivity doesn’t mean chaining workers to their desks for longer hours and flogging them to work harder. Enhanced productivity means giving workers the best, most up-to-date, and most efficient tools with which to apply their trade, and letting each worker accomplish more work in less time. Economists call it capital investment.
But along with the new machines, workers need to be upgrading their skills, their knowledge, and their comprehension of how to use the new equipment.
For 753,000 Albertans, that means becoming functionally literate to the point of being at least able to read and understand the instruction manuals.
The problem of illiteracy in our economy goes far beyond an inability to read.
In the broader sense, illiteracy is about those workers who lack the ability to comprehend complex sentences and ideas. It is the difference between learning to read, and reading to learn.
Literacy is not a special interest group — it’s a fundamental economic necessity. As we head into budget season, let us urge our governments to realize the importance of the work of literacy groups across the country and fund them accordingly.
This is of particular urgency in Alberta where labour shortages and faltering productivity threaten to put the brakes on the country’s fastest growing economy.
Todd Hirsch is chief economist for the Canada West Foundation
12:47 am on February 1st, 2007
I get the feeling more and more, that the CPC is going backward instead of forward. This program, as well as cultural programs, the Court Challenge program. This is certainly not like the former Progressive Cons. Party. It is still the Reform/Alliance who took the name Conservative to raise their profile and to try to gather former PC’s to this so called “New” party. The majority of its members are still Reform/Alliance. They have done all this and more, but think how backward they might become should they achieve majority status.
9:42 pm on February 1st, 2007
The Cons cutting things like volunteer initiatives and literacy show me that they are so out of touch with where the world is going and needs to go. The demographic realities dictate a larger volunteer populatoin and one that is going to be despirately needed. Literacy is not only the developed world’s dirty little secret because our rates are so embarassingly low…it is the easiest thing we cna do for immediate improvement in productivity, competativeness and workplaces safety and health care outcomes. DUH! Lets cut it! STOOPID as Forest Gump but not as charming